Experiments

Validation Experiments

Prioritization is a hypothesis, not a conclusion. Juno proposes one validation experiment per recommendation to close its largest evidence gap. You choose which ones to run.

X-01·interview·effort S
Proposed by Juno

Confirm IdP + SCIM scope with 3 enterprise IT contacts

Hypothesis: Okta + Azure AD + Google cover ≥80% of blocked deals; SCIM deprovisioning is acceptable as v1.

Evidence gap it closes: IdP breakdown across the four blocked accounts.

X-02·instrumentation·effort S
Proposed by Juno

Instrument first-session activation funnel

Hypothesis: ≥60% of new seats abandon before completing a starter task.

Evidence gap it closes: First-session funnel instrumentation.

X-03·instrumentation·effort M
running

Bisect 2.14 asset pipeline against 2.13 baseline

Hypothesis: Regression isolates to the asset pipeline change, not runner drift.

Evidence gap it closes: Whether the slowdown is uniform or concentrated on specific runner configurations.

X-04·interview·effort S
Proposed by Juno

5-interview validation with indie leads

Hypothesis: ≥3 of 5 indie leads share build reports externally today.

Evidence gap it closes: Whether other indie studios share build reports externally today.

X-05·instrumentation·effort S
Proposed by Juno

Pull workspace-level notification mute rate

Hypothesis: ≥25% of paid workspaces have muted at least one notification channel.

Evidence gap it closes: Workspace-level notification mute rate.

X-06·interview·effort M
Proposed by Juno

Top-20 enterprise prospect survey on on-prem vs SaaS

Hypothesis: ≤20% of prospects treat on-prem as a hard requirement.

Evidence gap it closes: The share of blocked enterprise deals that cite on-prem rather than SSO.